Removed unformatted symbols from code descriptions to avoid fail with code formatter from OpenAPI#318
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Damtev
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2022
Damtev
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but is a bit strange coverage matcher is never actually used. Perhaps we should refactor the check method someday.
Collaborator
Author
This module is full of problems. But the refactoring is not goal of this PR. Thanks |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes #271
Fixes # (issue)
Type of Change
Minor bug fix (non-breaking small changes)
How Has This Been Tested?
Run test generation for the
public static Stats of(double... values)method in guava-26, before bug fix it fails with the error described in the issue, after bug fix it produces tests wellChecklist (remove irrelevant options):